Reports suggest that an accurately tuned Sport 70-200 f/2.8 is closer in optical quality to the FLE than it is to the VRII. As someone who has owned all of the Nikon AF80-200s through the new 70-200 f/2.8S, I can tell you that the 70-200FLE is a definite upgrade on the prior versions. Hi again folks. So I'm hunting for a 70-200mm f2.8 lens. I'm shopping value for dollar here. For example, the new FL from Nikon is completely not cost effective (prices over $3600 in Canada). The Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR1 is price competitive with the Sigma OS 2.8, and the new Tamron. 70-200 FL @200mm f/2.8 quite close to the subject. The 300mm PF let you stand away a bit from this guy doing his scary mating dance thing. Still pretty sharp result. 300mm PF + TC-14e III gives some really neat closeup possibilities as well. Let us know what you take. Lovely images, Rico. I think it will be the 300! Yes. 20 Apr 2022. #2. The latest and greatest 70-200 F2.8 FL ED is a thing of wonder. Sharp centre to edge, even wide open, super fast AF and the VR is excellent. A lens you can totally trust to deliver the goods. My website. My Flickr My 500px My Instagram. Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G ED VR II (Referred as ‘70-200’ in test results) The Nikon 70-200mm lens is a professional-grade lens that was introduced by Nikon in the early 80’s in the shape of 80-200mm f/2.8 constant aperture lens. Since then, Nikon has been enhancing and redesigning the lens every 4-5 years, making it faster, sharper and The minimum focus distance is 1.4m, with a maximum magnification of 0.13x, which is a step back from the 1m minimum focus and 0.28x magnification of the most recent 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II. All this is topped-off by a price which, while substantially higher than the older lens, is still substantially lower than its Nikon and Canon The Nikon 80-200mm f2.8D ED AF is a superb 2.5x telephoto zoom for sports, portraits, and nature photography. With a fast and constant f2.8 maximum aperture through the entire focal range, ED glass elements provide high-resolution and high-contrast image even at maximum aperture. The rotating zoom ring provides precise zoom operation. Hi Brian, I have never compared side-by-side the two lenses (I understand you're referring to the 70-200/2.8 S vs the 70-200/2.8 FL, both with a fluorite element). However, if I were in your shoes, I'd buy the FL version; 1) it's been developed for high-res Nikon F-mount bodies (D850) and got excellent reviews, 2) it uses the same 1.4X as the 500 PF (the Z lens needs dedicated Z TCs), 3) the The first digital version of this lens, the AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8G IF-ED, often called the VR I (VR one) of this lens, does breathe but not as much as the 2009 version, the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II. The VR I when used at max zoom and focused at infinity had an effective focal length of 196 mm. When focused at it's minimum focus distance 4sszxEn.

nikon 70 200 f2 8 fl review